In the past week or so,
there has been a lot of news and reports of how actress Angelina Jolie
underwent a double mastectomy.
Though she didn’t have cancer, doctors have told her that she was 87%
more likely to develop breast cancer in comparison to the rest of the
population because she carries the breast cancer gene. What she did was thus seen medically as
something prophylactic, precautionary or protective, and one of the reasons she
did this was because she wanted to be around for her children. Seen in this light, it is a noble thing
to do. She is also (to many) a
symbol of modern feminine beauty, and being an actress, choosing to remove a
very obvious physical part of her femininity is deemed a very courageous act,
though with the advances of modern medicine and plastic surgery, she would be
physically restored such that there would be little visible difference between
the pre-op Angelina and the post-op Angelina. Indeed, so many have hailed her choice as a very courageous
act, with some saying that this brave choice gives much hope to other women
around the world.
This is not a medical
blog, and has never meant to be.
It is a blog of personal reflection of a spiritual nature, and I try to
be as personal and at the same time, spiritually positive and even instructive
as possible (after all, I am in the process of being trained to be a teacher of
the faith to others), hoping to be able to form the minds and consciences of my
readers.
What I’d like to base
this week’s reflection on is how we should define courage in the light of
faith. I don’t know what the faith
of Ms Jolie is, but I can only surmise that she doesn’t make any reference to
it in her op-ed (a term meaning “opposite the editorial page”, written by
someone not on the editorial team of the paper) in the New York Times. That she has children without being
married may give us some indication that she is not of the Catholic faith, but
these days, even that is something that we cannot ascertain. But whether she is or is not a
Catholic, is not a moot point in this week’s reflection. What I would like to reflect upon is
whether what she has done is something that is to be admired and perhaps even
emulated by faith-filled Christians, or whether there are other approaches to
such situations in life that are equally or even more courageous.
Do I think any less of
this? Putting myself in her shoes,
perhaps I too would do the same.
But I am not in her shoes, and one thing that sets me apart is that I
have my faith and am willing to write about it. That much is clear.
What does faith have to do with anything? Plenty.
Does it mean that
faithful people who are trying to live out their faith in God should not go for
the best medical care? Certainly
not. After all, the intelligence
of doctors is something that only God can give. But is this option that Ms Jolie has taken something that is
open and available to every person who is as susceptible to breast cancer as
she is? Just by looking at the
financial costs alone, this drastic step is something that only a few can
take. However, is there something
to be said about courage in another form?
Could people with faith display perhaps an even deeper courage than ‘grabbing
the bull by the horns’ and being one step ahead of cancer by trying to
eliminate all (or as much as possible) the chances of it happening to
them? What can we learn about
suffering and illness and give ourselves a chance to grow and mature from it
that we forego when we pre-empt too much on our part and rid ourselves from its
teaching presence in our lives? We
only need to look at none other than the Cross of Christ on Calvary for some
clear direction.
This is where faith in
God’s providence marks in a believer a clear distinction that sets us apart
from those of us who face such ‘border situations’ with only a clearly
practical and logical mind. The
kind of courage that faith elicits in us invites us to dare to allow God to
reveal his love and providence even in and despite situations of apparent
hopelessness, suffering, pain and sorrow.
While the world tries its very best to eliminate suffering, delay death,
look good and stave off anything that speaks of pain in all its myriad forms,
it is faith in the loving providence of God and his grace that opens one to the
possibilities of God’s voice that is spoken in and through these situations
that so many try to put as far away from themselves as possible. Christ on the Cross did not run away
from the suffering that was to come, but neither did he masochistically run
toward it. He knew that it had a
great redemptive value that was beyond what was apparent to the physical eye. Instead of ‘taking control’ of
the challenges of life as Ms Jolie advocates so loudly, Jesus in his humble act
of surrender is saying that there is great spiritual value in giving up control
of life’s challenges too. Imitating
and living out this kind of faith allows for one to become courageous in a very
different way, simply because it is a courage that is born of faith.
Living and struggling
with a difficult load in life is seen as something that is much more edifying
and transforming than doing without its teaching and formative dimension. Origen, a second century theologian and
Father of the Church (more edified in the Eastern Church than the Latin West)
was noted by Eusebius, a Roman historian, to have castrated or emasculated himself. His primary motive was to avoid
possible scandal due to his private instruction to women. He may have done this as a result of
reading Matt. 19:12 literally. But
it was later in life that Origen thought better of this drastic act. It was in his Commentary on Matthew
that he wrote disparagingly about taking 19:12 literally, deeming such an act
as an ‘outrage’. Why is this
so? We may not have it clearly in
writing from him, but perhaps it is that he saw later on in life (his second
half of life?) that removing a possibility to sin just so that one does not
ever fall into sin may not mean that one is a holy and spiritually mature
person. It only means that one no
longer has it as a source of holiness and transformation in one’s journey of
life.
This is the point I am
trying to make about Ms Jolie’s ‘courage’. Would it be seen as a courageous act to not have the
operation and live on daring to face the consequences of a cancer prognosis
down the road, and with a resolve, go through the different kinds of treatments
that will inevitably be painful and a physical struggle? Only with the eyes of faith would it be
seen as such. It would definitely
be a deeper sign of courage born of faith. And I am sure that there are plenty of women who have chosen
to go that way, but these ‘heroes’ and their act of courage go unsung and
unpublished and they may not have the same opportunity to write op-eds that are
featured in the likes of The New York Times.
I stress that I am not
condemning Ms Jolie’s act. What
she did was practical and pragmatic.
It was preventive and prophylactic. But we who are of the faith have a deeper dimension to
consider, and are asked to become images of Christ in the world have something
more asked of us than mere practicality and pragmatism. We are required to also give God a possible
chance to use our lives as a canvass on which he can reveal his love, often
through a redemptive suffering that many run immediately away from. As far as courage is concerned, this is perhaps where proverbial
rubber meets the road.
Could this be a
courage that God is asking of some of us in life?