Monday, June 29, 2020

Is your divine filiation what defines you? If it is, then you are in a most stable state of life.

There are many different ways that people choose to define themselves, especially in these times. Many who aren’t theists commonly define themselves by the work that they do.  This is especially so when they have attained some degree of excellence in their work and career, and have become what many consider as Captains of Industry. 

Evidence of this is when people encounter one another on a social level for the first time, and very often, after the initial introductions of names are exchanged, the next thing is the defining of their person by their jobs and titles, oftentimes printed on business calling cards.  The tendency is to equate the person with what gives them their source of financial stability in life.  

In the arena of the social media world, people are also often defined by their ‘followers’ and this has caused many to create a certain persona that is fabricated, sometimes with the help of creative agencies who are employed to help them relate to the public, hence the term Public Relations.  

This can have devastating effects on those who are so dependent on how others perceive them to be, because those created personas are often as  fragile as porcelain where with one scandal, the Instagram-perfection image is shattered into a million shards, when before it yielded over a hundred thousand “likes” and “followers”.  One particular episode of the dystopian fictional series Black Mirror titled “Nosedive” that can be accessed on Netflix, was a rather interesting depiction of how things can go horribly south if society was to be driven in such a shallow and utilitarian way.

In my encounter with the infirm, especially those who are afflicted by an illness that is particularly debilitating, there is also a strong tendency to let their illness define who they are.  They are often heard saying that they are cancer patients or stroke patients or even cancer survivors, sometimes making it almost like a badge of honour, letting their experience of the illness define who they are.  More to it, I have encountered senior members of the community who only see themselves as “old” and define themselves by the number of candles on their birthday cake.

As well, there are also many who strongly define themselves by their sexual orientation, giving them cause to be strong activists for the LGBTQ and similar movements.  There is a strong tendency for people of such persuasions to define themselves by their sexuality.   I am sure that many have heard of the phrase “you are what you eat”, with people promoting and advocating lifestyles like being vegan, vegetarian or pescatarian.  The ways that people define themselves have really caused society to be more separated and disunited than ever before, and this has proved to be a great stumbling block for harmony, peace and stability, both at the personal level, and at the level of society at large.

There are a whole host of problems that one brings upon oneself when one defines who one is by the things one does, or even what they are afflicted by in life.  If one defines oneself mainly by one’s career or title, the world can fall apart the moment one loses one’s ability to function at that level. No human person should ever define himself or herself by one’s illness, nor should they let themselves be defined by their illness either.  This is because it demeans the human being.  Our deepest selves are far more that what we can achieve, or by our sexuality alone.  However, the shallowness of this isn’t understood by many, especially if they aren’t theists.  

The real issue at hand in this reflection is that unless we discover (or re-discover) what our real and most fundamental identity is, and appreciate it anew, we will always be living with some form of insecurity and uncertainty.  The various kinds of ways of identifying ourselves in the earlier part of this reflection are but a few these examples.  There are countless other ways that people tend to define themselves by.  All of them have their limitations.  It’s not that they are morally bad in and of their own, but if one really ponders deeply about any one of them, they truly are insufficient to give anyone a lasting and totally stable base to find a real footing in life, most especially because each of them can be threatened by one’s fellowman or woman.  


It is for this reason that in order to be a truly secure man or woman in the life that each of us has while on God’s green earth, it is imperative that we find our greatest confidence and security in the fact that we are God’s beloved sons and daughters, which is what “divine filiation” really means.  Because this identification is connected to God, who is not of this world, and who is truly supernatural, this love that we have by God is also not in any way predicated and affected by anything or anyone in this life as we know it.  

This is what Jesus was ultimately alluding to when he said that we need to build on rock, and not on sand. This is also what he meant when he said that true discipleship (of Christ) is seen when we prefer God more than we prefer father, mother, son or daughter.  Even for relationships that are as tightly knit and beautiful in life, if we define ourselves just by them, these too can be taken away once the people in our lives are no longer in existence.  

It is also for this reason that the kindness that we extend to others because they are images of God’s love (made in his image and likeness) can really be acts of kindness that we show to God (like giving a cup of cold water to even little ones).  

I believe this is what the Trappist mystic and writer Thomas Merton was so graced to realize one day in downtown Louisville, Kentucky.  It was on March 18, 1958 while Merton was running some errands in downtown Louisville when suddenly, he saw every single person in his field of vision as having an inborn brilliance.  He described it this way in his book Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander:

“In Louisville, at the corner of Fourth and Walnut, in the centre of the shopping district, I was suddenly overwhelmed with the realization that I loved all those people, that they were mine, and I was theirs, that we could not be alien to one another even though we were total strangers.  It was like waking from a dream of separateness, of spurious self-isolation in a special world, the world of renunciation and supposed holiness… This sense of liberation from an illusory difference was such a relief and such a joy to me that I almost laughed out loud… I have the immense joy of being man, a member of a race in which God himself became incarnate.  As if the sorrows and stupidities of the human condition could overwhelm me, now I realise what we all are.  And if only everybody could realise this!  But it cannot be explained.  There is no way of telling people that they are all walking around shining like the sun.”

What Merton intuited through grace that day is the very same truth that Jesus was imparting to his disciples. Somehow, sin and evil have blinded us to this reality, and the spiritual journey has, as one of its most important tasks, to unveil this truth from our often biased and prejudiced eyes.  

It is when we truly understand how astounding it is that each of us have such a divine potential in the depth of our being, we will always only see ourselves as human doings, and not human beings – humans being loved unconditionally by God, our heavenly Father. 





Saturday, June 27, 2020

Audio homily for 13th Sunday in Ordinary Time

Click the link below to access the audio homily.  Please note that as our Sunday Masses resume in our parish next weekend, this will be the last of the posted audio homilies made during the Circuit Breaker in Singapore.  I hope these audio recordings have been helpful so far.

https://frlukefong.podbean.com/mf/play/vjucja/FrLukeFong13OT.mp3

Monday, June 22, 2020

Can we make a Confession and still not be reconciled?

There appears to be some confusion regarding the end or result of the sacrament of confession in quite a few peoples’ minds.  It has been raised to me as a very sincere question whether it is all right if one goes to confession for a sin, especially where the sin was the cause of a severing off of a relationship, but one still hasn’t reconciled with the person concerned.  In short, does confession necessarily also include reconciliation with parties somehow liking each other, and if there is no reconciliation, is the sin therefore unforgiven?

While this appears to be a legitimate question, it also reveals something that is not quite understood about the sacrament of confession itself.  Perhaps part of the confusion comes from the different names that this sacrament is given.  One of it’s other names is the sacrament of reconciliation, and if the terms ‘confession’ and ‘reconciliation’ are used interchangeably here, it does give the impression that one only really makes a sincere confession if one is also reconciled with the one whom one has sinned against.  

My response to this seeming quandary is to ask whom it is that the penitent is ultimately confessing to, and who is the one who is ultimately offended by the sin.  

When one goes to confession, one is confessing to God.  The priest confessor in the sacrament is acting in persona Christi, meaning ‘in the person of Christ.  Every sin that you and I commit in life is, essentially and ultimately, an offence against God.  God’s commands have been transgressed, and it is toGod that we admit of our fault, accuse ourselves of wrongdoing, and it is fromGod that we are asking pardon of our sins.  The person whom we have wronged is of course also someone whom we have sinned against, but even that is because every man, woman and child is made in the image of God himself.  When we understand this at its core, then we also understand that when we reverence each person in the world, we are also reverencing God himself.  It brings to mind what Jesus said to Paul when Paul encountered him on his way to Damascus, striking him down and asking him “Paul, why are you persecuting me?” 

Having said this, while it is imperative that we ultimately reconcile with God whom we have sinned against, we should, as far as we can, also reconcile with the person whom we have hurt or with whom we had the altercation that led to a sin being committed.  Here is where sometimes things aren’t always as simple as they appear to be, mostly because we are a mixed bag of memories, emotions and sentiments, i.e., human.



Sometimes there are things that happen in our human relationships that do not make it possible to fully reconcile with one another in a total and complete way.  Sometimes partings of friendships are necessary simply because our worldview is stridently different, and the differences between two people have become like chalk and cheese.  This is especially the case between two people, one of whom wants to centre his or her life totally on God, and the other is a strong atheist and only lives for himself or herself.  It’s not so bothersome when it is a platonic friendship, because I do have friends who have no theistic leanings and we disagree on many matters, but we are still friends.

I am referring more to spouses, or maybe even business partners, who have, because of a strong desire for holiness and godliness, necessarily became estranged.  One can become very perturbed if one believes that one can only be reconciled with God if one is also in the same way reconciled with the person with whom one parted ways with.    

Remember that God’s command is that we love one another, and not that we like one another.  Perhaps for most people, this is where things get a bit confused.  Jesus’ command to love is a decision from the heart, whilst liking someone is more often attached to feelings, sentiments and emotions.   Loving as a decision entails much more effort and therefore is more meritorious to the soul than liking.  This is why I can love my enemy but not like what he is doing to me.  If after a disagreement, or even a split in a relationship, I can still truly love my fellow man or woman and even ‘take a bullet’ for him despite my not liking him or her, I would be fulfilling God’s commandment.

While seeking reconciliation at the human level is certainly recommended and promoted, there are instances where it may even be more prudent to not stir up the hornet’s nest and let the land lay fallow, at least for the time being.  Some wounds are best left to heal with time, rather than picking at the scabs resulting in scars that grow deep and even covered with unsightly keloids. 

If we understand that the most important law is to love the Lord with all our heart, mind and soul, then it isn’t hard to understand that the most important thing in confession is that one is reconciled with God first as well.  And if it is possible and expedient, then the first thing that we do after coming out of the confessional is to be reconciled with our brother and sister.